|
Title: |
|
Authors:
|
|
Abstract: This
conceptual paper develops the “Ant Principle” as an integrative framework for
understanding the institutional conditions under which private self-interest aligns
with, or diverges from, collective welfare. Drawing on property-rights
economics, transaction-cost theory, collective-action theory, public choice,
and evolutionary biology (kin selection and inclusive fitness), our paper
argues that the correlation between individual incentives and social outcomes
is neither automatic nor inherent; it is tactically with understanding with
mediated. The framework specifies a causal sequence linking institutional rules
and property-rights arrangements to the distribution of private benefits and
costs, individual behavioural responses, coordination outcomes, and ultimately
the degree of convergence between private returns and social welfare. The
biological analogy is treated strictly as a comparative heuristic that highlights
how evolved coordination mechanisms in eusocial insects achieve alignment
without conscious contracting, while human societies must construct formal and
informal institutions to approximate similar results. Our paper clarifies the
distinctiveness of the Ant Principle relative to Coase, Demsetz, Ostrom, and
related traditions, with a more advance system tactic of human understanding of
collective outcome approach, which defines the welfare criterion employed,
incorporates distributional conflict and power, and derives a more advance set
of conditional human and institutional propositions. Our paper, aim to bridge
up the microeconomics to macroeconomics. Implications for new institutional
design, environmental governance, and the limits of both markets and states are
discussed. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51505/IJEBMR.2026.11019 |
|
PDF Download |