|
Title: |
|
Authors:
|
|
Abstract: The Farmers’ Terms-of-Trade Index, known in
Indonesia as Nilai Tukar Petani (NTP), is frequently interpreted as a direct
indicator of farmer welfare. This interpretation is problematic because NTP
primarily measures the relative movement of prices received by farmers against
prices they pay for household consumption and agricultural production. It does
not directly measure production volume, net income, farm size, land tenure,
debt, asset accumulation, food security, health, education, subjective
well-being, or resilience. This qualitative literature review examines why high
or rising NTP values can coexist with persistent deprivation among agricultural
households. Recent Indonesian evidence provides an illustrative paradox: NTP
may increase because the prices paid by farmers decline faster than the prices
they receive, even though producer prices, farm revenue, or profitability do
not improve. The review identifies seven interrelated themes: construct
mismatch, aggregation bias, the denominator effect, incomplete price
transmission, household heterogeneity, multidimensionality, and the importance
of farmers’ subjective evaluations. It proposes an integrated four-tier
measurement architecture comprising monthly market indicators,
agricultural-household economic accounts, a multidimensional Farmer Welfare
Index, and distributional and longitudinal statistics. NTP should therefore be
retained as a high-frequency indicator of relative-price conditions but should
not serve as a stand-alone proxy for achieved welfare. Indonesian agricultural
policy needs to distinguish statistical changes in purchasing power from
substantive improvements in farmers’ capabilities, economic security, quality
of life, and resilience. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51505/IJEBMR.2026.11007 |
|
PDF Download |