|
Title: |
|
Authors:
|
|
Abstract: The European Union’s Carbon Border
Adjustment Mechanism poses an unprecedented institutional and economic
challenge to carbon-intensive export industries in developing nations. While
existing literature heavily relies on macroeconomic simulations to forecast
trade impacts, a critical gap remains in comparative sectoral assessments
derived from firm-level empirical data. This study employs an Objective
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis integrated with the Entropy Weight Method to
evaluate the compliance readiness of four key Vietnamese sectors, which include
iron and steel, aluminum, cement, and fertilizers. Drawing on purposive
sampling and primary survey data from 134 export-oriented enterprises derived
from an estimated population of 200 firms using Yamane’s formula, the research
assesses sectoral preparedness across four core dimensions: emissions tracking
capacity, green innovation, green supply chain management, and perceived
compliance cost. By replacing subjective
expert-based weighting with data-driven weighting methods, the findings reveal
significant structural heterogeneity. The aluminum sector, with a composite
score of 3.50, and the fertilizer sector, with a score of 3.36, exhibit a
proactive adaptation trajectory supported by robust carbon accounting
frameworks. Conversely, the iron and steel sector and the cement sector, both
scoring 2.93, exhibit a more reactive compliance approach primarily constrained
by digital accounting deficits and high third-party verification costs.
Furthermore, green supply chain management emerges as a systemic vulnerability
across all sectors, highlighting that exporters are absorbing regulatory shocks
in isolation without integrated upstream support. Ultimately, the study
underscores that surviving cross-border environmental barriers requires
targeted macroeconomic interventions, emphasizing the urgent need for a
localized national emission factor database, specialized green credit funds,
and ecosystem-wide supply chain incentives. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51505/IJEBMR.2026.10718 |
|
PDF Download |