|
Title: |
|
Authors:
|
|
Abstract: Indonesia's
palm oil industry currently stands as the cornerstone of the national economy,
reminiscent of the historical dominance of the sugar and rubber industries.
However, historical precedents suggest that global commodity booms are often
followed by precipitous declines due to governance problems and the inability
to adapt to external pressures. This study employs a qualitative literature
review to analyse the trajectory of the palm oil sector through the lens of
institutional economics and historical comparative analysis. Specifically, it
investigates whether the current regulatory landscape — characterized by the
external pressure of the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), the
internal challenges of the Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO)
certification, and the landmark May 2026 Government Regulation (Peraturan
Pemerintah) establishing PT Danantara Sumberdaya Indonesia (DSI) as the
country's sole exporter of strategic commodities including crude palm oil —
supports long-term sustainability or inadvertently triggers the sector's
demise, mirroring the fate of the sugar and rubber industries. The review
synthesises data from reputable sources (2020–2026) to identify thematic risks:
the exclusion of smallholders due to high compliance costs, regulatory
fragmentation, stagnating productivity, and the new monopsony risk created by a
centralised state export monopoly. The study finds that while downstreaming
provides a temporary economic buffer, the exclusion of smallholders from the
formal supply chain creates a structural vulnerability similar to the neglect
that destroyed the rubber sector. The DSI policy, while designed to curb
under-invoicing, mis-invoicing, transfer pricing, and increase state revenues,
risks introducing transactional bottlenecks, market dualism, and a monopsony
dynamic that could further marginalise independent smallholders. The paper
concludes that without a radical shift toward "inclusive regulatory
architecture" that prioritises smallholder legality, harmonises national
standards with global demands, and ensures the DSI operates as a transparent
exporting facilitator, palm oil risks becoming a "sunset commodity."
Recommendations include shifting from defensive diplomacy to adaptive
compliance, improving subsidies toward upstream revitalisation, and ensuring
DSI's governance architecture is designed to strengthen market-driven export
networks. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51505/IJEBMR.2026.10614 |
|
PDF Download |