|
Title: |
|
Authors:
|
|
Abstract: This study investigated the effect of
private sector financing of public infrastructure on social welfare in Nigeria
and South Africa. The main objective was to examine the impact of private
infrastructure investments on poverty reduction and unemployment. Specifically,
the study analyzed the trends of infrastructural financing; determined the
effect of private investments in transportation, electricity, technology, and
education on the poverty index; and assessed the impact of these
sector-specific investments on the unemployment rate.
The study adopted an ex-post facto
research design. Time-series data covering a twenty-year period from 2005 to
2024 were sourced from the African Infrastructure Development Index and the
World Bank’s World Development Indicators. Data were analyzed using descriptive
statistics, Augmented Dickey-Fuller unit root tests, Johansen Cointegration
tests, and Multiple Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression. All hypotheses
were tested at the 0.05 level of significance.
Results from the multiple regression
analysis showed that in the Nigerian poverty model, private investment in
transportation had a highly significant negative impact on the poverty index (β
= -8.8018, p = 0.0021), while electricity financing remained statistically
insignificant (β = -1.8301, p = 0.5198). The model yielded an R² = 0.6044. In
the South African unemployment model, educational infrastructure financing had
a significant positive impact on the unemployment rate (β = 0.3583, p =
0.0006), indicating a paradoxical short-term exacerbation of joblessness (R² =
0.8862). Furthermore, Johansen cointegration tests established significant
long-run equilibrium relationships among the infrastructural variables and
social welfare indicators across both nations.
The study concluded that private investment in transport and technology infrastructure serves as a potent tool for poverty alleviation in Nigeria, whereas capital-intensive infrastructural expansion in South Africa paradoxically exacerbates unemployment due to structural labor rigidities. Recommendations include mandating local content utilization within private concession agreements to absorb local labor, enforcing pro-poor tariff structuring to prevent service commodification, and aligning educational curricula to mitigate the skills mismatch induced by technological advancements. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51505/IJEBMR.2026.10510 |
|
PDF Download |