|
Title: |
|
Authors:
|
|
Abstract: African constitutions increasingly enshrine socioeconomic rights
(SERs), including housing, healthcare, and education, reflecting a progressive
commitment to substantive equality. However, the practical realisation of these
rights frequently encounters a significant "justiciability paradox":
the tension between judicial pronouncements upholding SERs and their tangible
impact on citizens' lived realities. This article examines the legal and
practical challenges that impede the effective enforcement of constitutionally
guaranteed SERs across various African jurisdictions. Through an analysis of
landmark court decisions and jurisprudential developments across the continent,
this research investigates how courts have navigated the inherent complexities
of adjudicating resource-intensive rights, often balancing judicial activism
against concerns of budgetary constraints and separation of powers. We
scrutinise the mechanisms and remedies employed by African judiciaries and
critically assess the extent to which judicial interventions have translated into
meaningful improvements in access to, and quality of, essential services. The
article contrasts the aspirational constitutional guarantees with the
persistent implementation gaps and socioeconomic inequalities observed in
practice. By highlighting the disjuncture between formal constitutionalism and
actual societal change, this study aims to offer a nuanced understanding of the
obstacles to SERs’ realisation in Africa and propose pathways towards more
effective and impactful judicial and policy responses. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51505/IJEBMR.2026.10406 |
|
PDF Download |